...I suggest that you educate yourself about the properties and their constraints. If you continue to add values that violate those constraints, I will revert them in the future. You cannot rely on other people to cleanup the mess you make, for example on [Q95994985]. So please adhere to the established standards or suggest changes if you deem them to be inappropriate.
Topic on User talk:Edoderoo
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
There is a bot to add useless spaces into the ISNI-value. It is a useless, because the link to the information gives exactly the same result. So if you revert my edits, just because you have a personal preference on the formatting, I will consider that vandalism. Please assume good faith in each others edits, you might get the same good faith back.
d about the title. Please do your research well, the edits you "improved" were manual edits. Maybe you should not fill in the information you don't know. Not every edit on Wikidata is "automatic"d about the title. Please do your research well, the edits you "improved" were manual edits. Maybe you should not fill in the information you don't know. Not every edit on Wikidata is "automatic"nn
and this wiki-editor stinks. Good day.,
Property constraints are there for a reason. You can personally think of them what you want, but it has been decided sometime ago that Wikidata wants the ISNI values with spaces. It is not my personal preference. It's not hard to either stick to the standards or propose a change (whatever the outcome maybe). If people would adhere to the standards, then no bots would be needed to correct values later. Also: I never thought these edits were automatic, but from your manual edits I deduct the work your bot will probably do... Maybe you gonna prove me wrong. Happy editing :)
Well, if you believe you will help the project by reverting edits ''because you don't like the format'' altough it's just a mismatch with a wrong constraint (half of the constraints and warnings make no sense on WD), I think you make a huge mistake. And your attitude towards users you never spoke to before is also wrong. What happened to ''assume good faith'' and being friendly to begin with?
Well, if you believe you will help the project by doing such edits because "There is a bot to add useless spaces into the ISNI-value.", then go for it. Luckily there are others which care for the consistency of data and keep fixing that for you because you are too lazy to add 3 little spaces. I personally do not care if we store the raw or human-readable version of ISNI, but at least it should be consistent and not sometimes this and sometimes that. The constraint here is not "wrong", it is there for consistency. Also: Can you tell me a reason to be especially friendly to a user who apparently does not care about adding data the way it should be. Do you want a hug and a present before i tell you my thoughts that your edits have been subpar? Your answers have shown that you are in no way interested to improve your edits in the future, what "good faith" shall I assume here?
If you are blind as you are, I prefer you keep away from my talk page. This project is not about me or you, especially not about you. If you believe my edits are all wrong, please contact an admin.
Another person who cannot stand criticism *shrugs*. All I asked was that you adhere to the agreed standards for values for properties, not only ISNI, as there have been others. But feel free to continue as you like, I do not want you melting any further.
cf https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q16358587&diff=1227925928&oldid=1110985796 not only spaces, but outright fake information
This "fake information" came from the category structure as in 2017.