Property talk:P730

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

service retirement
date or point in time on which a piece or class of equipment was retired from operational service
DescriptionDate on which the equipment was retired from operational service
Representsservice retirement date (Q29933838)
Associated item
Data typePoint in time
Template parameteren:template:infobox aircraft (retired)
Domain
According to this template: manufactured products - device (Q1183543)
According to statements in the property:
device (Q1183543), vehicle model (Q29048322), vehicle (Q42889), watercraft type (Q16335899), factory (Q83405) and weapon model (Q15142894)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesany date later than its service entry (P729) (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleF-105 Thunderchief (Q724763)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P730 (Q21037780)
See alsodissolved, abolished or demolished (P576), discontinued date (P2669)
Lists
Proposal discussionProperty proposal/Archive/11#P730
Current uses7,087
[create] Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P730#Single value, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Difference with “service entry (P729)” within range [0, 10000]: the difference with property “service entry (P729)” should be in the range from “0” to “10000”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P730#Diff within range, SPARQL (new)


add type constraint[edit]

could someone add factory (Q83405) as type constraint please? P730 is useful also for power station (Q159719) (sub-sub class of factory) and alike. But factories and other large facilities can't reasonably be classified as device (Q1183543), which would be the only option at the moment. --Te750iv (talk) 02:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Additional note: dissolved, abolished or demolished (P576) (refers to physical disappearance or demolition), and discontinued date (P2669) (only for "products") are no alternatives. Both are not suitable for still existent, but retired power stations. --Te750iv (talk) 02:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

could someone check please, if my suggestion makes sense?

Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE) – work account, mainly for development discussions
Jarekt - mostly interested in properties related to Commons
MisterSynergy
John Samuel
Sannita
Yair rand
Jon Harald Søby
Pasleim
Jura
PKM
ChristianKl
Sjoerddebruin
Salgo60
Fralambert
Manu1400
Was a bee
Malore
Ivanhercaz
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Pizza1016
Ogoorcs
CennoxX Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject property constraints. --Te750iv (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support Makes sense to me. - PKM (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support Makes sense to me too. I've been using it with i.e. water tower (Q274153) that still stands, but are no longer used for their original purpose.--Hjart (talk) 19:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)