Property talk:P4876

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

number of records
number of values of an identifier or records in a catalog
Data typeQuantity
Domaindata set (Q1172284), Wikidata property for an identifier (Q19847637), controlled vocabulary (Q1469824), encyclopedia (Q5292), dictionary (Q23622), database (Q8513), Wikidata qualifier (Q15720608), MediaWiki website (Q15633582), Wikidata property related to classification schemes (Q108566342), ranked list (Q80793969) or version, edition or translation (Q3331189)
Allowed values0 ≤ 𝓧 ≤ 1E161 ≤ 𝓧 ≤ 1,000,000,000,000
Allowed unitsnot applicable
ExampleGRID (Q27768150) → 85,582
GRID ID (P2427) → 85,582
See alsodata size (P3575), expected completeness (P2429), number of parts of this work (P2635), collection or exhibition size (P1436), amount cataloged (P7328)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total4,861
Main statement4,85199.8% of uses
Qualifier90.2% of uses
Reference1<0.1% of uses
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “data set (Q1172284), Wikidata property for an identifier (Q19847637), controlled vocabulary (Q1469824), encyclopedia (Q5292), dictionary (Q23622), database (Q8513), Wikidata qualifier (Q15720608), MediaWiki website (Q15633582), Wikidata property related to classification schemes (Q108566342), ranked list (Q80793969), version, edition or translation (Q3331189): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “data set (Q1172284), Wikidata property for an identifier (Q19847637), controlled vocabulary (Q1469824), encyclopedia (Q5292), dictionary (Q23622), database (Q8513), Wikidata qualifier (Q15720608), MediaWiki website (Q15633582), Wikidata property related to classification schemes (Q108566342), ranked list (Q80793969), version, edition or translation (Q3331189)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Type Q1172284, Q19847637, Q1469824, Q5292, Q23622, Q8513, Q15720608, Q15633582, Q108566342, Q80793969, Q3331189, SPARQL
Range from “0” to “1e+16”: values should be in the range from “0” to “1e+16”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Range, hourly updated report
Units: “novalue”: value unit must be one of listed. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Units
Integer: values should be integers (ie. they shouldn't have a fractional part) (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#integer, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Required qualifier “point in time (P585): this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Single value, SPARQL
Range from “1” to “1000000000000”: values should be in the range from “1” to “1000000000000”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Range
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#citation needed
Allowed entity types are Wikibase property (Q29934218), Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Entity types
Item “expected completeness (P2429): Items with this property should also have “expected completeness (P2429)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4876#Item P2429, SPARQL

Use for Wikipedia?[edit]

Can we use this for the number of articles on items about Wikipedia language versions?
--- Jura 08:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jura1: I'd rather use number of parts of this work (P2635). --Marsupium (talk) 08:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use as qualifier for Stack Exchange tag (P1482)?[edit]

@Jura1, Marsupium: WikiProject Properties has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.

Hi! I want to add this as qualifier to Stack Exchange tag (P1482) to state that (see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2539#P1482):

So I've added to this prop:

  • property scope constraint
    • property scope
      • as main value
      • as qualifier

Do you agree in general?

And another question: I get a warning that "point in time" cannot be applied to Stack Exchange tag (P1482).

  • And that's correct: here "point in time" and "applies to part" are sub-qualifiers (qualifiers to the qualifier, not to the main snak).
  • Wikidata doesn't support such complex constructs, and I'd rather not create a sub-object for "Machine Learning on stats.stackexchange.com"
  • So do you agree with this slight twisting of the semantics?

Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]