Property talk:P3842

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

located in present-day administrative territorial entity
the item was located in the territory of this present-day administrative unit; however the two did not at any point coexist in time
Descriptionthe item was located in the territory of this present-day administrative unit; however the two did not at any point coexist in time.
Associated item
Data typeItem
Domain
According to this template: geographical object (Q618123)
According to statements in the property:
administrative territorial entity (Q56061)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed valuesitems for places (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
ExampleMetropolitan Borough of St Marylebone (Q180652)City of Westminster (Q179351)
Kyle and Carrick (Q6451531)South Ayrshire (Q209131)
See alsolocated in the administrative territorial entity (P131)
Lists
Proposal discussionProperty proposal/located in present-day administrative territorial entity
Current uses654
Search for values
[create] Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): human (Q5), Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410), Wikimedia category (Q4167836), Wikimedia template (Q11266439), Wikimedia module (Q15184295): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Conflicts with P31, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Item “dissolved, abolished or demolished (P576): Items with this property should also have “dissolved, abolished or demolished (P576)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Item P576, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Type “administrative territorial entity (Q56061): element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “administrative territorial entity (Q56061)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Type Q56061, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
Value type “administrative territorial entity (Q56061): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value administrative territorial entity (Q56061) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3842#Value type Q56061, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)

Constraints[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Complex relations[edit]

@Jura1, Jheald, ArthurPSmith, Pigsonthewing, ChristianKl: Who all were involved in the PP. Ytterlännäs rural municipality (Q10723852) existed until 1974, when it was dissolved. Today you find Kramfors Municipality (Q514815) here. Q514815 was founded 1971 and expanded the following years. So to some extent, these two coexisted for a few years! But Ytterlännäs did not become a part of Kramfors until after it was dissolved. I think this property makes sense here, even if it does not fulfil every letter in the present description! -- Innocent bystander (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)