Property talk:P444
Documentation
review score received by a creative work or other entity
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#Type Q386724, Q43229, Q17350442, Q783794, Q618779, Q2424752, Q17334923, Q116779426, Q81113235, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#Conflicts with P4032, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P444#citation needed
(Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?note ?before ?after { ?item wdt:P444 ?note. FILTER (CONTAINS(STR(?note), "/")) BIND (STRBEFORE(?note, "/") AS ?before) BIND (STRBEFORE(?note, "/") AS ?after) FILTER (xsd:float(?before) < xsd:float(?after)) }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P444#Check values like 3/10
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
format constraint[edit]
i just protected the ., otherwise it stands for any character and added A+ to F-, as said in allowed values.--Akkakk 08:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Domain[edit]
Lots more things than works are reviewed: restaurants, charities, hotels, etc. I've relaxed the constraints accordingly. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing:, maybe, you should somehow relax them a bit more? For example, see Q202163#P444. Wikisaurus (talk) 07:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- I've added "venue" as an allowable class. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 07:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Convert to Percentage[edit]
Perhaps this property would be more useful if the values were converted to a percentages? Perhaps this field should be converted from a String to a Quantity? U+1F360 (talk) 16:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- I oppose considering values as percentage because many reviewers use different types of reviews. I wanted to support converting it to quantity, but then I saw Team Fortress 2 (Q382108); a showcase item. See the review score by 1UP.com for example; it's "A". Ahmadtalk 09:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Usage on the review items itself?[edit]
Telling Lies review – endless possibilities in brilliant detective story (Q66733562) is the review of a work (Telling Lies (Q62529754)).
I understand the main use case for review score (P444) is to be on the work, but I think it also makes sense to have it on the review − in which case, the mandatory qualifier review score by (P447) does not make much sense.
Thoughts?
Jean-Fred (talk) 13:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Jean-Frédéric: let's add a statement is subject of (P805) in cases like these?! Shisma (talk) 09:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that would make sense. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- All Properties
- Properties with string-datatype
- Properties used on 100000+ items
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with scope constraints
- Properties with qualifiers constraints
- Properties with conflicts with constraints
- Properties with citation needed constraints
- Properties with complex constraints