Subjects are instances, not classes [ edit ]
We never say A is a science, right?
Please don't use subclass of or (P279) instance of to link this. You may use (P31) part of instead. (P361)
Btw, I do want to see some specified version of part of . (P361) 金亦天 ( talk) 05:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q8027727 , Talk Q336 , Talk Q475023 Talk
Status: not resolved
some languages (de,es,pt) link a term to science that also includes arts and humanities, but in enwiki it is (Q336) en:science which does not include arts and humanities. Diskussions: de:Diskussion:Wissenschaft#Comment_on_meaning_on_other_languages en:Talk:Science#Interwiki-Links-- Hokanomono ( talk) 16:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Further, -- exact science seems to be the same as (Q475023) science .-- (Q336) Hokanomono ( talk) 19:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Hokanomono ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
There are the following distinct notions:
Wissenschaft/Scientia/Cienca/Nauka: includes science, humanities and philosophy
en:Science: includes formal sciences and natural science, but does not include humanities and philosophy.
These have to be split.
exact science is very close to the English science, but maybe slightly different. (Q475023) en:exact science is not very precise about that.
The disambiguation page
Science includes links to some pages with a totally different spelling. I will split them out. -- (Q1294710) Hokanomono ( talk) 17:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Done disambiguation page links-- Hokanomono ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
At first I thought, that it was the best to leave -- en:science linked to science and have a new item for Wissenschaft/Scientia/Cienca/Nauka, but as for example (Q336) social science is defined as a (Q34749) subclass of of (P279) science , it may be better to consider (Q336) en:science to be the misplaced link in science and leave most of the others in place. Some (e.g. (Q336) en:science, ja:科学) will have to be moved to a new item for the restrictive notion of science.-- Hokanomono ( talk) 20:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Hokanomono ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
At least in those three cases,
en:Science, de:Wissenschaft and pt:Ciência, the connection between them is correct ( Ref.). Lauro Chieza de Carvalho ( talk) 22:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
As a German-speaking scientist I have no doubt that the German term Wissenschaft includes theology (possibly disputed by some philosophers, but in the mainstream opinion it is Wissenschaft), history, jurisprudence, literary science, mathematics, and engineering. See also
and Wissenschaft is not the same as science de:Portal:Wissenschaft. For me the open questions are: what are the other language articles about? Are the articles' subjects similar enough for an inter-wiki link to be more useful than confusing?-- Hokanomono ( talk) 09:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
de:Wissenschaft a notion that includes science, mathematics, logic, engineering, philosophy, theology, jurisprudence and humanities. see also
de:Naturwissenschaft natural science
de:Realwissenschaft empirical sciences
en:Science not clear, probably science covering natural sciences, social sciences and formal sciences. cf.
en:Science (disambiguation), en:Talk:Science#Distinction from philosophy, en:Talk:Science/Archive_6#Interwiki-Links
en:Natural science natural science
la:Scientia (ratio) a notion that includes science, mathematics, logic, engineering, philosophy, humanities, jurisprudence, theology and astrology
DDC 001 [ edit ]
12:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC): draft, please use the template talk page for comments;
tree might be delayed by ~15 minutes; suggested values for TREEVIA and TANDEMTREEVIA: subclass of , (P279) instance of , (P31) part of , (P361) has part , (P527) occupation , (P106) field of work , etc. (P101) in order to see another language please change the
WMFLCODE-parameter value in preview mode only
science · (Q336) · purge · T · WLH · tree · reasonator DDC: 001 · DDCTANDEM: 000 · tree using · TANDEM: part of (P361) scientist · (Q901) · purge · T · WLH · tree · reasonator tree using subclass of (P279)